Showing posts with label Daniel Pantaleo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Daniel Pantaleo. Show all posts

Friday, December 5, 2014

Personal Encounters with New York City Policing

I lived in New York City for five years beginning in the late 1980s. This was when the city had yet to undergo its surge in gentrification that really got rolling under Giuliani; for instance, Times Square was still a squalid strip of peep shows, adult bookstores and rundown steak houses. 

I had my run-ins with the police. One time, when I was living in a neighborhood of Dominicans and Hasids tucked up against the eastern entrance to the George Washington Bridge a white undercover cop accosted me as I was crossing 181st Street on my way back to my apartment. He demanded to see some identification; he wanted to know what I was doing. He puts his hands on me and went through my pockets. I told him I lived in the neighborhood and was on my way home.

The cop was incredulous. He couldn't imagine a white rock'n'roller young man living willingly among blacks and orthodox Jews. The neighborhood was notorious for being the preferred destination for suburbanites to acquire street drugs. It is a narrow part of northern Manhattan conveniently bisected by Interstate 95.

Finally, I defused the situation by inviting him up to my apartment. I told him something like, "If you don't believe me, come on up. I'll show you where I live."

He dismissed me with the imperative to stay out of trouble, warning me that he would be watching.

I wasn't really upset by the encounter, more dumbfounded than anything else. It seemed ludicrous, comical that undercover police could bodily search and interrogate a person in broad daylight on a busy thoroughfare with zero cause besides falling within the parameters of an overly broad profile. Nonetheless I can vividly recall the encounter more than twenty-years on.

This was not my only run-in with New York City's finest. I actually got into an altercation late one Friday night with a Transit Authority police. The location was 136th Street 1-line subway stop. The cop ended up calling for backup. A gang of undercovers arrived and frogmarched me at high velocity up a long flight of subway-station stairs and threw me in the back of their cruiser. Off I went at breakneck speeds with sirens wailing to a Harlem police station to spend the night locked up.

What had I done? I asked why the Transit Authority police was hassling my friend for having an unlit cigarette on his lips. Smoking is not allowed in the subway but he wasn't smoking. The Transit Authority police responded to my inquiries by telling me to "Shut the fuck up and put your hands above your head."

My retort? "Fuck you!"

And that's when the altercation began. The people on the platform -- all black and Latino -- formed a circle around me and the Transit Authority cop as we grappled and chanted, "Police brutality! Police brutality!"

I had forgotten about this incident until this week when the Garner grand jury refused to indict the undercover policeman, Pantaleo, for homicide.

Not all of Gotham's constabulary are Gestapo types. During my residence in the Big Apple I came across several, particularly the ones who were my age, in their 20s, who were approachable, more so than your typical big city West Coast police who affect sort of a sterile haughty professionalism.

The Garner murder has struck a chord. It is a stain on the credibility of the U.S. You'll be less likely in the immediate aftermath of the ongoing #BlackLivesMatter protests to witness John Kerry climbing up on his high horse to hector other nations about good government.

Something has shifted from business-as-usual patterns. Even Hillary, who anticipates success by roping crackers into the Democratic Party at the same time keeping the "Obama coalition" loyal, is sounding off about racial justice. According to Peter Baker and Amy Chozick's "Some Conservatives Say Deadly Force Used to Subdue Garner Didn’t Fit the Crime":
. . . Mrs. Clinton drew broader conclusions. “Each of us has to grapple with some hard truths about race and justice in America,” she said, speaking at a conference in Boston. “Because despite of all the progress we’ve made together, African-Americans, most particularly African-American men, are still more likely to be stopped and searched by police, charged with crimes and sentenced to longer prison terms.” 
Mrs. Clinton endorsed Mr. Obama’s decision to form a task force to review police tactics and praised the Justice Department’s decision to investigate Mr. Garner’s death. She called for changing police tactics, overhauling the prison system and demilitarizing police departments. At times, she struck the personal tone some had expected of Mr. Obama. 
“The most important thing each of us can do is to try even harder to see the world through our neighbors’ eyes,” she said. “To imagine what it is like to walk in their shoes, to share their pain and their hopes and their dreams.”
For Hillary to take this stand you know it has been vetted by campaign operatives and focus-group tested. The politics of outrage over racial injustice have gone mainstream.

The Gray Lady's editorial board bears this out. Over the last two days some of the best items written on the Garner homicide can be found in the unsigned editorials. Two things stand out in "It Wasn’t Just the Chokehold: Eric Garner, Daniel Pantaleo and Lethal Police Tactics." First:
But among the many needed reforms, there is one simple area that risks being overlooked. Besides the banned chokehold used by Officer Daniel Pantaleo, who brought Mr. Garner down, throwing a beefy arm around his neck, there was lethal danger in the way Mr. Garner was subdued — on his stomach, with a pile of cops on his back. 
This breaks a basic rule of safe arrests, especially for people who, like Mr. Garner, are overweight and have medical problems like asthma. When the New York medical examiner’s office ruled Mr. Garner’s death a homicide, it cited “compression of neck (choke hold), compression of chest and prone positioning during physical restraint by police.” 
As early as 1995, a Department of Justice bulletin on “positional asphyxia” quoted the New York Police Department’s guidelines on preventing deaths in custody. “As soon as the subject is handcuffed, get him off his stomach.Turn him on his side or place him in a seated position.” 
As Michael Baden, a former chief medical examiner of New York City, told The Times: “Obese people especially, lying face down, prone, are unable to breathe when enough pressure is put on their back. The pressure prevents the diaphragm from going up and down, and he can’t inhale and exhale.” 
Which is exactly what Mr. Garner was trying to tell the officers who were on top of him.
 Next:
The Garner killing must lead to major changes in policy, particularly in the use of “broken windows” policing — a strategy in which Officer Pantaleo specialized, according to a report in September by WNYC, which found that he had made hundreds of arrests since joining the force in 2007, leading to at least 259 criminal cases, all but a fraction of those involving petty offenses. The department must find a better way to keep communities safe than aggressively hounding the sellers of loose cigarettes. 
And while defenders of the police like to point to thousands of nonfatal misdemeanor arrests as evidence that officers are acting in a way that is reasonable and safe, there can never be a justification for any lethal assault on an unarmed man, no justification for brutality.

The outrage in New York, echoed by anguished protesters in Ferguson, Mo., and in Cleveland, where the Justice Department has found a pattern of excessive force by the police, is based on a genuine fear of aggressive, abusive cops.

Thursday, December 4, 2014

Something is Happening Here


There are numerous differences between the Eric Garner and Michael Brown police homicides -- Garner's murder was a death by choking on the streets of Staten Island which took place several weeks before Brown's and involved a bevy of undercover cowboy cops; whereas Brown's shooting death was the result of a lone police gunman in a St. Louis suburb -- but the foremost difference is that Garner's murder was clearly caught on video; that, and the fact that the medical examiner ruled Eric Garner's death a homicide.

The video evidence and medical examiner's determination bolstered normally timid politicians, and hence we have calls from New York City's congressional delegation, along with Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, for a federal investigation, something that the Justice Department has signaled it will undertake.

According to Vivian Yee, in what is the best single story in the Gray Lady today (and, to the Gray Lady's credit, there is ample coverage of the Staten Island grand jury's decision not to indict the police, Daniel Pantaleo, who murdered Eric Garner as well as the protests that broke out last night in New York City), " ‘I Can’t Breathe’ Is Echoed in Voices of Fury and Despair: In Chokehold Case, Protesters Revive a Staten Island Man's Dying Words":
“The failure to indict is a stunning miscarriage of justice, and makes clear that equal protection under the law does not exist for all Americans,” said Hakeem Jeffries, a Democrat from Brooklyn who, along with other members of New York’s congressional delegation, spoke at the Capitol to call for a federal investigation into Mr. Garner’s death. 
“What more does America need to see?” Mr. Jeffries said. “We are better than this as a country.” 
Senator Kirsten E. Gillibrand, Democrat of New York, called Mr. Garner’s death “a tragedy that demands accountability.”
To my knowledge, nothing similar happened -- no calls for a DOJ civil rights investigation were made by the St. Louis congressional delegation and Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill -- on behalf of Michael Brown.

Certainly, New York City is different from St. Louis. New York City is a multi-cultural Mecca and magnet for educated, aspiring youth; along with Los Angeles and Oakland and Portland and Seattle and San Francisco and D.C., it is a progressive city that at certain moments can tilt towards the radical. The multiple protests last night were an encouraging sign.

Staten Island, where the grand jury that refused to indict Pantaleo took place, is the reddest of New York City's five boroughs. While there are pockets of gumba white supremacy in Brooklyn and Queens, terra firma of white working-class ressentiment has always been Staten Island.

What makes Vivian Yee's article stand out is all the person-on-the-street quotes:
Yet this was no Ferguson, where conflicting witness accounts obscured the circumstances of the confrontation between Michael Brown and Darren Wilson, the white officer who shot him. This encounter was recorded at close range on a cellphone camera, the fact that kept many on Wednesday asking: How? Why? 
“You can see the video,” said Diane Moss, 63, of Staten Island, her voice strained with disbelief. “It’s one thing if it’s ‘he said, she said,’ but when you see the video — the guy wasn’t resisting.” 
Her neighbor, Marjorie Fabre, 53, seethed next to her.
“They keep on showing the tape on TV, over and over and over,” she said. The officer, Daniel Pantaleo, had been trying to arrest Mr. Garner for selling loose cigarettes. “I mean, over a cigarette?” 
What could you say, people asked, when the evidence could not seem clearer. What conclusion could you draw, other than: 
“It looks like there’s no change,” said Jesse Love, who was one of a few dozen protesters who gathered at the scene of Mr. Garner’s death, outside a beauty supply store and opposite a humble park. No change in police behavior, in the way African-Americans are treated by the legal system, in race relations. 
“We had a video. How can we win? We can’t win,” said a man who gave his name as James. 
The Staten Island grand jury's refusal to indict not only casts doubt on the legitimacy of the grand-jury process itself but on the merit of supplying police body cameras as a way to increase law enforcement accountability.

Something is happening here. The public reaction to the Michael Brown and Eric Garner verdicts strikes me as different from business as usual.

Once again when I emerged from the train station last night after work there were clumps of police arrayed in front of the big downtown department stores. A blatant show of force.

I walked a few blocks to the main public space in the heart of the downtown commercial district, the place where Occupy Seattle was launched over three years ago. The Christmas displays -- the Star of Bethlehem on the Macy's building, Santa's Corner, a busy Christmas carousel -- were prominent. There were TV trucks and lots of police, some in riot gear. The protest underway was tiny, sponsored I think by the Freedom Socialists. Some young guys with beards milled around handing out a leaflet on Jim Crow justice while a women angrily spoke into a bullhorn. A few steps a way children happily rode the rapidly circling Christmas carousel.

Bizarre. The police presence was total out of proportion to the protest. Why? I think the power elite, even at the city level, sense that a shift is occurring. People are fed up. Even if the number of protesters pale in comparison with previous popular mobilizations (Iraq, Occupy), there is a sense that the many lies that constitute the status quo are exposed. Plutocracy, white supremacy, the warfare state, underemployment. Just keep going on down the list. These things can no longer be credibly denied. A compelling canard is not available to paper over the injustice that is the everyday reality in the U.S. And that is scary for those in charge.