Showing posts with label Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf. Show all posts

Thursday, July 26, 2018

National Vote in Pakistan: "The Biggest Theft of an Election Since the 1970s"

UPDATE: From Reuters' "Pakistan's Imran Khan declares victory, on verge of becoming prime minister":
With 48 percent of the total vote counted, Khan’s PTI was listed by the ECP in its provisional results as leading in 113 of 272 contested National Assembly constituencies.
Sharif’s PML-N was ahead in 64 constituencies, and the PPP, led by the son of assassinated two-time prime minister Benazir Bhutto, led in 42 constituencies.
Although Khan still appeared likely to fall short of the 137 seats needed for a majority in the National Assembly, he should have no problems finding coalition partners from smaller parties and independents.
[snip] 
Investors welcomed Khan's election success, with Pakistan's benchmark 100-share index .KSE surging as much as 1.9 percent to 42,136 points in early trade, before closing 1.8 percent up. Analysts said there was relief Khan was unlikely to have to rely on major opposition parties in a messy coalition.
Khan has promised an “Islamic welfare state” and cast his populist campaign as a battle to topple a predatory political elite hindering development in the impoverished nation of 208 million, where the illiteracy rate hovers above 40 percent.
****

After 9/11 and for much of the aughts mainstream U.S. media coverage of Pakistan was relatively plentiful in terms of foreign affairs reporting. There was broad if superficial understanding that 9/11 tracked back to Pakistan, and then following the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan it was common to read in the "newspaper of record" that Pakistan's powerful equivalent of the CIA, the ISI, Inter-Services Intelligence, was orchestrating the Taliban's insurgency.

If I had to guess I'd say at some point during Obama's second term, as the U.S. military announced that it was winding down its mission in Afghanistan, Pakistan -- the sixth largest country on the planet; home to the "Muslim bomb" -- largely disappeared from American collective consciousness, such as it is.

Trump brought back Pakistan front and center briefly at the beginning of the year when he threatened to cut foreign aid to the country due to its support for terrorism.

Yesterday there was a national election in Pakistan. If you were going to choose from two stories to read -- Jeffrey Gettleman's "Imran Khan, Former Cricket Star, Pulls Into Lead in Pakistan’s Vote Count" or the Guardian's roundup, "Pakistan election in disarray as incumbent rejects result" -- I'd go with the Guardian.

The Guardian says that Imran Khan's party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), looks to have won enough to seats to form a government. But The New York Times says the PTI has come up short.

On top of it all is a broad rejection of the election by parties other than the PTI due to vote-rigging, not to mention a delay in the official count because of a software meltdown. According to the Guardian:
The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), an independent body, blamed the delay in announcing the result on a breakdown in the Results Transmission Software it purchased from a British company.
“There’s no conspiracy, nor any pressure in delay of the results,” the ECP secretary, Babar Yaqoob, told reporters. “The delay is being caused because the result transmission system has collapsed.”
[snip] 
As election workers sorted through massive piles of paper ballots, almost all the parties – except the PTI – alleged that their polling agents had been excluded from polling stations. 
Bilawal Bhutto, the leader of the liberal Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) – the country’s third-largest party – tweeted it was “inexcusable and outrageous” that his activists had been excluded “across the country”.
The complaint was echoed by his rival Khadim Rizvi, the foul-mouthed cleric who leads the far-right Islamist group, Tehreek-e-Labbaik (TLP). “This is the worst rigging in history,” said a spokesman for Rizvi.
The PMLN senator Musadik Malik told journalists that security officials had taken over proceedings inside polling stations, with a particular focus on constituencies where the race was close between the PTI and PMLN.
“If what most political parties are alleging is true,” Aqil Shah of Oklahoma University said, “it would be the biggest theft of an election since the 1970s”, adding that the the parties should “unite and demand a repeat.

Friday, September 19, 2014

Scots Buckle at the Polls: Fear Triumphs over Courage Once Again

The "No" vote ended up winning by a landslide, 55 percent to 45 percent. It was too grand a thought to think the Scots would stand in a majority to deal a blow to Empire. Despite some favorable polls recently and a sense of momentum, the "Yes" campaign for Scottish independence was always operating under an enormous burden, and that burden was that voters had to display some personal courage. There was a tremendous amount of fear-mongering in the mainstream media. Scottish independence would result in economic collapse, or so we were told by the experts.

The overwhelming majority of people are ruled by fear. In light of this, 45 percent for independence is very encouraging.

Fear will always triumph in the voting booth. We saw this in Pakistan's spring 2013 elections. Despite a lot of excitement, activism and momentum, support for Imran Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf collapsed at the polls. Nawaz Sharif's Pakistan Muslim League-N walked away with the victory.

I participated in a similar monumental battle of hope versus fear in the Nader 2000 campaign. In spite of huge Super-Rallies and a legitimate grassroots Green Party volunteer movement, Democrat's fear-mongering carried the day (but not for the Democrats themselves, who continued to blame Nader supporters for costing the listless Al Gore the presidency). Nader couldn't even tally 3 percent of the vote nationally. The goal was to reach 5 percent in order that the Green Party could qualify for public funding the next election.

Fear apparently is much stronger than hope when it comes to a public vote. It is a Hobbesian world.

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Support for Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Disappears at the Polls

Salman Masood has a story in today's paper about Pakistan's election victor, Nawaz Sharif, visiting his humbled opponent Imran Khan in the hospital. Khan is recovering from a broken back he suffered on the campaign trail. Sharif is riding high; his Pakistan Muslim League-N party surpassed expectations. He can afford to be gracious. The boisterous support for Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party evaporated at the polls. Charges of vote-rigging are being bandied about. And while I'm sure there is some substance to them, the underlying reality is that politics is a grubby affair. We like soaring rhetoric and big pictures; but when it comes time to vote, fear and hate are in the booth with the ballot. Khan's electrifying rallies -- like Nader's in 2000 -- didn't translate to a large percentage of the vote.

What troubles me about a Sharif-led government comes towards the end of yesterday's story by Declan Walsh -- the outsize influence of Saudi Arabia:
But in foreign policy, Mr. Sharif has another source of support: his close relationship with Saudi Arabia, where he whiled away his exile. King Abdullah helped broker Mr. Sharif’s return to Pakistan in 2007, and Mr. Sharif maintains close ties with Riyadh. That relationship, although discreet, could provide an alternative source of economic aid, as well as a powerful ally.
I'm not a big fan of the Persian Gulf monarchies and their deep-pocketed support for the global export of the Wahhabi movement.